DeLorean Mailing List - 6/18/98

Thursday, June 18 1998         Volume 03 : Number 378



       In this issue:

        DML: Re: Delorean problems

        DML: Re: DeLorean Wanted

        DML: DeLorean Owner Translation Guide  :-)

        Re: DML: COLUMBUS WAREHOUSE

        Re: DML: Re: DeLorean Wanted

        DML: warehouse theft

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        DML: Who's DMC is it?

        DML: Re: The Best Vacuum Cleaner for a DeLorean

        DML: removing paint from cars

        DML: part prices

        Re: DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion

        DML: Windshield availability

        DML: WAREHOUSE Theft

        Re: DML: warehouse theft

        Re: DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion

        DML: Part Prices and DeLorean Viability

        DML: Columbus Event

        DML: Engine swap

        Re: DML: Engine swap

        DML: "Di-electric" grease

        DML: Re: Who's DMC is it?

        Re: DML: "Di-electric" grease
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 11:40:41 -0400

From: "Joe " <dmcjoe(AT)att.net>

Subject: DML: Re: Delorean problems
Jim,

This does not sound good. You took your car to a mechanic who did an

improper repair procedure by, as you described, "He tapped  it to another";

that does not sound like the proper way to repair a fuel pump voltage

problem. The next mechanic said that "the wiring was all messed up"; was he

referring to what the first mechanic did? Before these guys do any more

harm to your car go to your yellow pages and look for repair places that

advertise work on Volvo's. Call them and ask them about repair work on an

82' Volvo 260 GLE V-6. This car has the same engine and fuel system as your

DeLorean. Wherever you have positive results let them know that you can get

parts and tech support. If you need additional assistance let me know. 

Joe/DeLorean Services

- ----------

> From: Jim Plamondon <saab82(AT)hotmail.com>

> To: dmcnews(AT)world.std.com

> Subject: DML: Delorean problems

> Date: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 3:00 AM

> 

> Hi this is Jim Plamondon from Iowa, Council Bluffs. Right next to Omaha.

> 

> I'm having many problems w/ my car.  It is a 81, vin 1746, automatic, 

> and 16,000 miles on it.  We got it for only 16,000 dollars.

> I'm only 16 and have little  money to spend, I have help from my dad.

> I have put over 1,500 mile sence we bought in Feb.

> 

> when we got it, it didn't like to start hot. After awhile it got slower, 

> then 

> died.  I took it to a machinc, he said it was the wire to the fuel pump 

> was dead.  He tapped  it to another and it work.  It was still slow and 

> didn't start Inertia switch still work w/ the tap wire to the fuel pump.

> He cold not do no more to it so I took it to another mechanic.  The 2nd 

> mechanic said that the reason the car was slow was that the wiring was 

> all messed up and needed to be fixed. I don't think thats right, but I 

> could be wrong.

> 

> Jim Plamondon

> Saab82(AT)hotmail.com

> vin 1746

> 

> P.S. I have put in fresh gas (the car sat  in  a show room for about 

> 2yrs), new fuses, and new boot that hold the fuel pump.

> 

> ______________________________________________________

> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

> 
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:14:54 -0400

From: Mike Griese <magriese(AT)us.ibm.com>

Subject: DML: Re: DeLorean Wanted
You are not likely to find a DeLorean for under $5000 that can

be restored.  If there is anything left at all, it becomes worth more

as parts.
Michael A. Griese

IBM Storage Systems Division

Rochester, MN  55901

Internet: magriese(AT)us.ibm.com
'81  #2135
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:09:46 -0400

From: Mike Substelny <SUBSTEM(AT)cesmtp.ccf.org>

Subject: DML: DeLorean Owner Translation Guide  :-)
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "I don't care if my DeLorean gets attention, I just like the car."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "Hell yes I love the attention!  What are you, nuts?"
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "The wire antenna in my windshield gets crystal clear

       radio reception."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "A haven't figured out how to turn on my radio yet."
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "I have never, ever been locked in my DeLorean."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "A previous owner installed Lockzilla before I bought this car."
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "My DeLorean is a real runner."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "It runs great at highway speed, but if I get stuck in a traffic

      jam my Ducey alternator doesn't put out enough power, so

      my battery dies, my cooling fans quit, my engine overheats, 

      and my coolant bottle bursts."
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "No, sir, I didn't find any cocaine in the doors."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "If I hear that stupid comment one more time, somebody's

      gonna get their butt kicked!"
WHEN A DELOREAN OWNER SAYS:

     "I wouldn't trade my DeLorean for any other car in the world."

HE/SHE REALLY MEANS:

     "I wouldn't trade my DeLorean for any other car in the world."
- - Mike Substelny
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 13:44:46 -0400

From: Marc A Levy <malevy(AT)dnrc.bell-labs.com>

Subject: Re: DML: COLUMBUS WAREHOUSE
Steve did not have them arrested?!  I know I would have!
What valuable parts were there to steal?? (That would be small enough to

steal, obviously you could not walk off with a door or fender!)
It is a shame that steve is now forced to eliminate the possibly of

another event like this, but I cant say I blame him.
Even though the day may not have been profitable for him in sales, I

think the benefits of this kind of thing show up down the road.  When

someone needs a part they will be less likely to find a alternate or

make something if they now see that it is highly possible that it is

sitting in a warehouse in Ohio (or Houston). I think to the message a

while back about someone trying to put a Volvo motor in a DMC.  Would he

have tried that if he saw the racks of engines sitting in the werehouse?
On a personal note, I found it a bit depressing, and upsetting.  Looking

at the amount of "stuff" in there you would get a false sense of a

endless supply of parts, but As we all know, there are still many hard

to find parts.  On the other hand, with the quantity of some of the

parts, you would think that the prices would be lowered!  It is not free

to store all that stuff, or loose the interest on the money invested (no

need to get in to a whole economic evaluation here).
Example:

  I saw a few boxes of Craig radios and speakers.  Most of the cars I

saw in cincinnati had after market radios installed.  There is a very

low demand for original Craig radios, and a similar radio today would

sell for under $100 (WITH the speakers!), yet part# 100441 is still

listed at $275.00!! If you want all 4 speakers, that is another $210! 

Obviously, not too many of these will be sold.  The thought is that it

is not worth $275 to have the radio, but at $100 it may be worth it to

have a original radio.
I had to purchase a rear hub assembly a few years ago, I don't remember

how much I paid, but I do remember being surprised at how much it was (I

think it was like $600 or more).  It killed me to see boxes and cases in

almost every isle filled with these things! This item is really not in

the same category as a radio, but still!
I can only hope this will slowly change as Steve gets things organized.
I did however find the experience interesting, and I am glad I had the

opportunity to be there. I even spent some money too! Thanks Steve!!
and, a Question: I thought the Delorean windshields were all gone?!  I

saw a few crates of them at the warehouse, and they looked to be in good

shape.
Scott Mueller wrote:

> 

> Yesterday, I was informed that this past weekends open house at the

> warehouse would have been deemed worthwhile for DMC Houston if not for

> the blatent theft of many valuable parts.  Security personel witnessed

> and identified several people who are responsible for giving us all a

> bad name.  Because of this theft, I understand that we will not be

> allowed in the warehouse in the future.  These people have ruined it for

> all of the rest of us.  Those of you that are responsible for the theft

> of the parts should be ashamed of yourselfs.  I would suggest that you

> try to make ammends for your crimes and beg forgivness.  Steve was very

> generous in allowing us to pick through his inventory like we would at

> Walmart.  I'm suprised that you were not arrested on the spot, myself, I

> would have had you thrown in jail, which is still an option!

> 

> Please share this post with your friends that are not members of this

> mailing list.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 14:01:09 -0400

From: Sean Jones <shain(AT)noln.com>

Subject: Re: DML: Re: DeLorean Wanted
Hello,
Thats what i figure.  I almost bought a bricklyn for 8k, but changed my

mind and wanted a d.  They are just so much better.  I'll find one.
Sean
Mike Griese wrote:
> You are not likely to find a DeLorean for under $5000 that can

> be restored.  If there is anything left at all, it becomes worth more

> as parts.

>

> Michael A. Griese

> IBM Storage Systems Division

> Rochester, MN  55901

> Internet: magriese(AT)us.ibm.com

>

> '81  #2135
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 15:10:55 -0400 (EDT)

From: "Sean P Mullally" <mullally(AT)pilot.msu.edu>

Subject: DML: warehouse theft
Well this is unfortunate. The DMC folk were extremely generous, and

trusting,

when they let us into their facility, even providing refreshments. They

didn't

have to do any of that! Alot of people enjoyed seeing the warehouse last

weekend, but under the curcumstances, I would not blame DMC if they chose

not

to do this again. You said security identifed the people. Does this mean the

parts were recovered? Personally I would encourage DMC to press charges.

Theft

is never acceptable, but it is worst when someone has given their trust like

DMC did for us.
- -Sean Mullally

vin 3868



>Yesterday, I was informed that this past weekends open house at the

warehouse

>would have been deemed worthwhile for DMC Houston if not for the blatent

theft

>of many valuable parts. Security personel witnessed and identified several

>people who are responsible for giving us all a bad name.  Because of this

>theft, I understand that we will not be allowed in the warehouse in the

future.

> These people have ruined it for all of the rest of us.  Those of you that

are

>responsible for the theft of the parts should be ashamed of yourselfs.  I

would

>suggest that you try to make ammends for your crimes and beg forgivness.

Steve

>was very generous in allowing us to pick through his inventory like we

would at

>Walmart.  I'm suprised that you were not arrested on the spot, myself, I

would

>have had you thrown in jail, which is still an option!
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 16:09:15 -0400

From: Sean Jones <shain(AT)noln.com>

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
Hello,
Thats is very sad that someone had to steal a parts.  But i do think that

there

prices should come down a bit.  $275 for a 1981 craig stero seems to be a

little

much.  But then other things are alot cheaper.  I guess it will change after

they know exactly what they have and how much.  Can they make reproduction

parts.  Like panels and things?
Sean
Sean P Mullally wrote:
> Well this is unfortunate. The DMC folk were extremely generous, and

> trusting,

> when they let us into their facility, even providing refreshments. They

> didn't

> have to do any of that! Alot of people enjoyed seeing the warehouse last

> weekend, but under the curcumstances, I would not blame DMC if they chose

> not

> to do this again. You said security identifed the people. Does this mean

the

> parts were recovered? Personally I would encourage DMC to press charges.

> Theft

> is never acceptable, but it is worst when someone has given their trust

like

> DMC did for us.

>

> -Sean Mullally

> vin 3868

>

> >Yesterday, I was informed that this past weekends open house at the

> warehouse

> >would have been deemed worthwhile for DMC Houston if not for the blatent

> theft

> >of many valuable parts. Security personel witnessed and identified

several

> >people who are responsible for giving us all a bad name.  Because of this

> >theft, I understand that we will not be allowed in the warehouse in the

> future.

> > These people have ruined it for all of the rest of us.  Those of you

that

> are

> >responsible for the theft of the parts should be ashamed of yourselfs.  I

> would

> >suggest that you try to make ammends for your crimes and beg forgivness.

> Steve

> >was very generous in allowing us to pick through his inventory like we

> would at

> >Walmart.  I'm suprised that you were not arrested on the spot, myself, I

> would

> >have had you thrown in jail, which is still an option!
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 17:17:45 -0400

From: Marc A Levy <malevy(AT)dnrc.bell-labs.com>

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
This made me think that my message may have not been clear.  The theft

and the selling prcies were 2 seperate issues that just seem to follow

in my message when I wrote it.  I am in no way saying that the theft had

anything to do with the prices!  Even if you think something is too

expensive, that does not make it ok to steal it!
Also, after re-reading the first message (Sean Mullally), it seems to

implicate that the guilty person(s) are members of this mailing list. 

If this is true, maybe the list should take some action?  Obviously none

of us are responsible for any other members actions, but I dont think we

should just accept this behavior.

Sean Jones wrote:
> Thats is very sad that someone had to steal a parts.  But i do think that

> there

> prices should come down a bit.  $275 for a 1981 craig stero seems to be a

> little

> much.  But then other things are alot cheaper.  I guess it will change

MODERATOR'S NOTE: It is indeed unfortunate that this seems to have happened

(do we have accurate first-hand information on this or is it hear-say?). I

would be interested in any suggestions you might have on how we might best

go about righting the wrong. Obviously we all value the relationship we have

with Steven and DMC, and appreciate his stellar service as well as his

hospitality in hosting us at the warehouse. If there is a suitable approach

to making ammends we should pursue it.
					Knut Grimsrud

					Guest Moderator
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 16:50:42 -0500

From: scottmueller(AT)zebra.net (Scott Mueller)

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
MODERATOR'S NOTE: I'd prefer to see the discussion heading towards

constructive ways to address the issue rather than argue about how wrong it

is (which I think is pretty well accepted).
					Knut Grimsrud

					Guest Moderator

The price of the parts is no justification for theft.  I think that you

are missing the point.  Stealing is wrong, there is no justification for

it.  A person that would steal a part that costs $200 would also steal a

part that costs $50.  A thief is a thief.  The cost of the stolen parts

has to be paid for by someone, guess what, that someone will be you and

me.
Sean Jones wrote:

> 

> Hello,

> 

> Thats is very sad that someone had to steal a parts.  But i do think that

> there

> prices should come down a bit.  $275 for a 1981 craig stero seems to be a

> little

> much.  But then other things are alot cheaper.  I guess it will change

after

> they know exactly what they have and how much.  Can they make reproduction

> parts.  Like panels and things?

> 

> Sean

> 

> Sean P Mullally wrote:

> 

> > Well this is unfortunate. The DMC folk were extremely generous, and

> > trusting,

> > when they let us into their facility, even providing refreshments. They

> > didn't

> > have to do any of that! Alot of people enjoyed seeing the warehouse last

> > weekend, but under the curcumstances, I would not blame DMC if they

chose

> > not

> > to do this again. You said security identifed the people. Does this mean

> the

> > parts were recovered? Personally I would encourage DMC to press charges.

> > Theft

> > is never acceptable, but it is worst when someone has given their trust

> like

> > DMC did for us.

> >

> > -Sean Mullally

> > vin 3868

> >

> > >Yesterday, I was informed that this past weekends open house at the

> > warehouse

> > >would have been deemed worthwhile for DMC Houston if not for the

blatent

> > theft

> > >of many valuable parts. Security personel witnessed and identified

> several

> > >people who are responsible for giving us all a bad name.  Because of

this

> > >theft, I understand that we will not be allowed in the warehouse in the

> > future.

> > > These people have ruined it for all of the rest of us.  Those of you

> that

> > are

> > >responsible for the theft of the parts should be ashamed of yourselfs.

I

> > would

> > >suggest that you try to make ammends for your crimes and beg

forgivness.

> > Steve

> > >was very generous in allowing us to pick through his inventory like we

> > would at

> > >Walmart.  I'm suprised that you were not arrested on the spot, myself,

I

> > would

> > >have had you thrown in jail, which is still an option!
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 18:10:33 -0400

From: Sean Jones <shain(AT)noln.com>

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
Hello,
I know that the prices had nothing to with the theft.  I should have sent 2

e-mails, or had 2 paragraphs.  Sorry for the misconfusion.  I think that the

theif should return the parts and aks for forgivness,  so that others can

view

parts and see the great warehouse.  So when i get a DeLorean i can view the

massive amount of parts.
Sean
Marc A Levy wrote:
> This made me think that my message may have not been clear.  The theft

> and the selling prcies were 2 seperate issues that just seem to follow

> in my message when I wrote it.  I am in no way saying that the theft had

> anything to do with the prices!  Even if you think something is too

> expensive, that does not make it ok to steal it!

>

> Also, after re-reading the first message (Sean Mullally), it seems to

> implicate that the guilty person(s) are members of this mailing list.

> If this is true, maybe the list should take some action?  Obviously none

> of us are responsible for any other members actions, but I dont think we

> should just accept this behavior.

>

> Sean Jones wrote:

>

> > Thats is very sad that someone had to steal a parts.  But i do think

that

> > there

> > prices should come down a bit.  $275 for a 1981 craig stero seems to be

a

> > little

> > much.  But then other things are alot cheaper.  I guess it will change

>

> MODERATOR'S NOTE: It is indeed unfortunate that this seems to have

happened

> (do we have accurate first-hand information on this or is it hear-say?). I

> would be interested in any suggestions you might have on how we might best

> go about righting the wrong. Obviously we all value the relationship we

have

> with Steven and DMC, and appreciate his stellar service as well as his

> hospitality in hosting us at the warehouse. If there is a suitable

approach

> to making ammends we should pursue it.

>

>                                         Knut Grimsrud

>                                         Guest Moderator
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 15:49:49 +0000

From: ausmith(AT)pdx.oneworld.com

Subject: DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion
Hi,
It this is true it's a fairly small group to find the culprit in. Has 

anyone checked with Steven to find out if it is true?
Perhaps the money that was left over should be used to reimburse them 

for the loss. Then, maybe, next year or 2000 could be a repeat?
Chris

MODERATOR' NOTE: I don't think it would be productive to get into more

detail on who/what in this forum. Thanks for your suggestion on a

resolution.
				Knut Grimsrud

				Guest Moderator
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:14:48 -0400

From: Sean Jones <shain(AT)noln.com>

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
Hello,
Your correct.  Sorry moderator.  We'll pay,  but thats the wya the world

goes.

I just realy wanted to see the wherehouse some day, and rome freely.  Ohh

well.    I get the point very well.  Since i sent the first messgae i had

the

point.  Even a baby would know it's wrong
Scott Mueller wrote:
> MODERATOR'S NOTE: I'd prefer to see the discussion heading towards

> constructive ways to address the issue rather than argue about how wrong

it

> is (which I think is pretty well accepted).

>

>                                         Knut Grimsrud

>                                         Guest Moderator

>

> The price of the parts is no justification for theft.  I think that you

> are missing the point.  Stealing is wrong, there is no justification for

> it.  A person that would steal a part that costs $200 would also steal a

> part that costs $50.  A thief is a thief.  The cost of the stolen parts

> has to be paid for by someone, guess what, that someone will be you and

> me.

>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 18:40:08 EDT

From: My83DMC(AT)aol.com

Subject: DML: Who's DMC is it?
    Hello!

             I remember awhile back, maybe.. 2 years ago, I saw a DeLorean

come into my Junior High School parking lot.. Someone came up to it, opened

the door, literally threw their books in, and it *rumbled* off. I never saw

it

again, but I heard two reports about it..
One person said that he was coming out of the band hall, and he saw a

DeLorean

parked there.
Another High School friend said that he knew someone in High School that

owned

a DeLorean, but didn't know who..  (That doesn't make sense, I know.)
       I guess this person went to college, or moved away.. This scenario

took

place in a "very" small town called Rusk, Texas. Is this person on the list?

If so, I would like to talk to him..
- -=]

Supratik Lahiri

http://members.aol.com/Zamere/index2.htm

DeLorean Headquarters

My83DMC(AT)aol.com
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 18:57:46 -0500 (CDT)

From: dlwrence(AT)ix.netcom.com

Subject: DML: Re: The Best Vacuum Cleaner for a DeLorean
Mike,
Sorry for the lateness of this reply, but I subscribe to the digest version.
I am deffinetly not a first place concourse winner, and don't even own a 

DeLorean (hopefully to be rectified in the somewhat near future).  I am, 

however, a car detailer.  I use a run-of-the-mill wet/dry shop vac, the kind
you can get at Home Depot.  Make sure to get one with all the attachments 

for cleaning those small, hard to reach places.  Also be sure to pick up a 

heavy duty extention cord so you can reach both sides of the car.  Also, a 

tip: clean your pedals.  This is one of those things you don't notice until 

you see two cars side by side and one has clean pedals and the other does 

not.  It makes a big difference and is often overlooked.  Please, please 

don't use Armor-All though; it is way to slippery.  I use Lexol Vinylex. 
I have always felt bad that I can't provide all of you with help and 

assistance since I don't own a DeLorean, but if anyone wants advice and/or 

help on the appearance end of things, I would be more than happy to offer my
assistance.
On another note, I was sadly not able to attend the Cincinnatti show this 

past weekend, and now it seems that, thanks to some certain people, myself 

and many others may not ever get the chance to see the warehouse.  It 

saddens me that there are those among us that would stoop so low as to steal
from people like Steve, who has provided 200 some-odd people with an 

experience they will never forget.  Whoever you are, you have given some 

great people a very bad name.
Mike Lawrence

VIN: Counting the days...
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:30:15 -0400

From: Vicki Miller <"1000mil(AT)gte.net"(AT)gte.net>

Subject: DML: removing paint from cars
ref- painted deloreans...

despite what you have been told or read, you can remove the paint 

from the cars..things need are:

heat gun

air craft grade stripper

a  flat plastic spoon

and a whole lot of time.......

the car i did was  red a one time, other than the damage to the  front 

fenders the   rest of the car was straight...rest assured I will never 

buy another painted delorean.......stainless is the way to go.
bob miller

questions call 919-383-6187

or email 1000mil(AT)gte.net
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 22:03:14 PDT

From: "Brandon S. Moody" <bsmoody(AT)kih.net>

Subject: DML: part prices
Although I didn't have a car to show this year,  I'm working

on one to be ready next time.  In the past I have worked on

Bricklins, porsche, Volkswagens, and currently drive a

Taurus SHO and GMC typhoon.   When you compare DMC

parts to the domestic FORD, GMC, Chrysler stuff,  parts do

seem very very over priced.  BUT,  sometime if you run across

a porsche 944, 911 owner,  ask them what a clutch cost ?

Hub bearing ?  Rack assembly ?  etc...   Try finding a 

turbo for a VW G60 Corrado.  I think you will find that us D

owners are lucky to have parts and at the prices we can get them.
- -Brandon

bsmoody(AT)kih.net
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 21:55:06 PDT

From: "Brandon S. Moody" <bsmoody(AT)kih.net>

Subject: Re: DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion
Its very unfortunate that this happened.  But,  everyone must

understand that if Steven or other employee/security person

suspected that theft was occuring,  they have a very important 

decision to make.  They have much more at risk than the 

value of the part(s).  Unless one or more people are absolutely

beyond a doubt sure that someone had taken something without

paying, then it would not be in their best interest to approach that

person and accuse them of theft.  If wrongly accused,  it could 

cause bad feelings and loss of business plus public humiliation

of the person.  If they didn't pay for their parts, they will get

hit another way in the future.  I'm sure that when they call

DMC houston, PJ Grady, Etc..  the next time,  the welcome

will probably not be as nice.  Plus,  they are probably on the

list watching all of this.  So,  I would say that they will not be

showing their faces around car shows in the future.  

Sorry for rambling,  but its just my thoughts.  I am curious to

what was taken ?
- -Brandon
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 18:43:43 -0700

From: "lseiler(AT)radiance.com" <lseiler(AT)radiance.com>

Subject: DML: Windshield availability
At 01:44 PM 6/17/98 -0400, you wrote:

 ........................... I thought the Delorean windshields were all

gone?!  I

saw a few crates of them at the warehouse, and they looked to be in good

shape........................ 

 
reply:
Last fall I replaced my windshield because it was not an original. There

was at least one thread here on the DML about this subject.............I

could have told you that Steve had them in stock! You can get just about

any part you need from Steve.

Lee
Radiance Software International

1726 Francisco Street

Berkeley California 94703 USA

Tel: 510-649-9118 Fax: 510-848-7613

lseiler(AT)radiance.com
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 18:34:43 -0700

From: "lseiler(AT)radiance.com" <lseiler(AT)radiance.com>

Subject: DML: WAREHOUSE Theft
At 10:27 AM 6/17/98 -0500, you wrote:

>Yesterday, I was informed that this past weekends open house at the

>warehouse would have been deemed worthwhile for DMC Houston if not for

>the blatent theft of many valuable parts.  Security personel witnessed

>and identified several people who are responsible for giving us all a

>bad name..........
reply:
	I found this post very disturbing, If this "report" is true I would

like

to see the name of people who are suspected of theft. I expect that if the

thefts actually took place that Steve will prosecute every single person

involved, no exceptions. I would also expect that any person found guilty

would be expelled from the DML, and from any DMC organization.

	There is simply no excuse for stealing parts. What's more because of

the

seriousness of the charges I expect to see the source of the information,

and I expect to see every one involved with the Ohio doings to take an

active part in settling the matter ASAP. I include in this the organizers,

the folks at Houston, and every one who attended, including any one who

pocketed a part. I assume no one walked off with a front left fender panel

in his pocket.

	If some one needed a part that bad, why not ask Steve or any one of

us for

a bit of help.

	This really pisses me off!
note: James I know you don't like any trouble here on the list, but I just

don't think any DMC owner would condone stealing from Steve. Please post

the above.
Lee

  
Radiance Software International

1726 Francisco Street

Berkeley California 94703 USA

Tel: 510-649-9118 Fax: 510-848-7613

lseiler(AT)radiance.com
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:38:38 EDT

From: KayoOng(AT)aol.com

Subject: Re: DML: warehouse theft
Another good thing gone sour.

Now we all have to suffer.

Some people are just that way.

You can dress them, just can't take them no where.

They have a pair of brass b-lls.

What can they have taken?

In front of everyone even?
Kayo Ong
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:09:28 -0700

From: "lseiler(AT)radiance.com" <lseiler(AT)radiance.com>

Subject: Re: DML: Warehouse theft - resolution suggestion
At 03:49 PM 6/17/98 +0000, you wrote:

 
>

>MODERATOR' NOTE: I don't think it would be productive to get into more

>detail on who/what in this forum. Thanks for your suggestion on a

>resolution.

>

>				Knut Grimsrud

>				Guest Moderator

Knut,
	I feel it's real unfair to have posted the start of this thread and

then

cut it off after half a dozen replies. Every Delorean owner has been hurt

by this incident, and we all should have both an opportunity to discover

just what happened and who was involved.

	I was not even there, but I may now not be allowed to gain access to

the

Ohio or Houston warehouses because of the theft, I would like to know who

has created the problem and I like even less not being able to fix the

problem with help from other DML members. I or others might be able to

offer Steve something in the way of a member apology or something to show

that his efforts and his trust were well placed

	In my opinion it is very poor judgement to post something so

inflammatory

to the DML and then cut off all discussion after just a few responce. Yes I

know this is James list to do what he wants and he/you can be capricious,

but I must point out that the subject and the general consequences are

quite serious.  I think you should allow it to continue, with a warning to

keep the discussion clean and with in the rules. Access to parts and

Delorean related events is quite important.
lee

Radiance Software International

1726 Francisco Street

Berkeley California 94703 USA

Tel: 510-649-9118 Fax: 510-848-7613

lseiler(AT)radiance.com

MODERATOR'S NOTE: I have dropped very few postings on this thread thus far

as manifest by the barrage of messages along the thread and the discussion

is clearly not cut off. However, I would prefer to see the discussion

concentrate on postivie aspects of how this issue can be resolved. Continued

postings on the poor judgement excercised by the individuals involved is not

adding any new information to this thread (I think we can all agree that on

that) and it's time to explore ways in which to resolve the problem and

attempt to restore the damage done to our relationship with DMC (Houston).
					Knut Grimsrud

					Guest Moderator
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 11:19:38 -0400

From: Mike Substelny <SUBSTEM(AT)cesmtp.ccf.org>

Subject: DML: Part Prices and DeLorean Viability
Brandon said:
> . . . sometime if you run across a porsche 944, 911 owner,  ask

>  them what a clutch cost ?  Hub bearing ?  Rack assembly ?  etc...

>  Try finding a turbo for a VW G60 Corrado.  I think you will find that

>  us D owners are lucky to have parts and at the prices we can get

>  them.
Brandon is right.  Last month my wife's Porsche 924S (a 944 with slim

fenders) needed some parts.  I shopped around and discovered that

many Porsche parts were about the same or more expensive than

DeLorean parts, and some are very hard to find.
As a firm believer in capitalistic free enterprise, I always encourage

everyone to shop around for the best price on everything.  The

opportunities to shop around or interchange Porsche parts seem to be

much more limited than DeLorean parts.  A few VW parts will work, but

those aren't cheap either!
I am tempted to say that we DeLorean owners are lucky to have so

many possible sources for so many parts, but luck has nothing to do

with it.  I appreciate the foresight of John Z. DeLorean, and the

contributions of Marvin Katz, Rob Grady, Stephen Wynn, James Espey,

Knut Grimsrud, Dave Bauerle, Leif Montin, John Truscott, Ed Bernstien,

and many others.
Each of these people has done one or more specific things that helped

make my DeLorean a more viable daily driver after 17 years than it was

the day it was manufactured.
- - Mike Substelny
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 11:06:03 -0500

From: Stephen Wynne <delorean(AT)ix.netcom.com>

Subject: DML: Columbus Event
To all of you on the list:  We appreciate your concern and outrage.  We =

are composing a more thoughtful reply and will post it soon.  Until =

then, we urge you to return to the everyday business of the list, which =

is the care and feeding of your Deloreans.  Regards, Stephen and the DMC =

Staff.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 12:59:07 EDT

From: JSteuben(AT)aol.com

Subject: DML: Engine swap
Hey Brandon,
Any chance that a SHO engine would fit in a 'D'?  Might be the perfect

solution>

Regards,  Joe
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 14:00:29 PDT

From: "Brandon S. Moody" <bsmoody(AT)kih.net>

Subject: Re: DML: Engine swap
> Hey Brandon,

> 

> Any chance that a SHO engine would fit in a 'D'?  Might be the perfect

> solution>

> Regards,  Joe
Joe ( and everyone else).   I am still working on a project car with a

friend

that is going to have a different engine.  The SHO was just one that we

are looking into.  I have owned an SHO since 1993 and love it.  Its really

a small engine (3.0 - 3.2) L  so size is not a problem.  However,  it was

made

only for the SHO Taurus and is set up in a FWD format.  When placed in the

D in the rear facing mount,  then things don't work really well.  Lots of

custom

hardware would have to be fabricated just to cradle the engine.  Probably

the

hardest part would be the OBD system and EEM.  I will post something in the

future when a decision is made.   
- -Brandon

bsmoody(AT)kih.net
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 13:01:48 -0600

From: Greg Guillot <gguillot(AT)mccno.com>

Subject: DML: "Di-electric" grease
For those of you who were at the tech session held by Rob Grady, he 

mentioned using di-electric grease, or grease that does not conduct 

electricity. Rob stated that dielectric grease should be used to 

lubricate and protect electrical connections since the grease will 

not ground out electrical circuits. Unfortunately, no one seemed real 

clear on exactly what type of grease is actually "di-electric." Well, 

when I returned home, I used my multitestor to check the White 

Lithium grease that I have been using, and sure enough - it is 

non-conductive. The brand I have is Gunk White Lithium grease, which 

I purchased at Pep Boys. This stuff is also used on mechanical parts, 

such as hinges, etc. I have been using it to lubricate all parts as I 

go through the car and clean and relubricate all connections and 

joints/hinges.

If anyone who is more electrically or mechanically inclined has a 

better idea, please share it with us.
Greg Guillot

VIN #2926
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 13:06:31 -0600

From: "Gremlin" <gremlin(AT)gremlin.net>

Subject: DML: Re: Who's DMC is it?
- -----Original Message-----

From: My83DMC(AT)aol.com <My83DMC(AT)aol.com>

To: dmcnews(AT)world.std.com <dmcnews(AT)world.std.com>

Date: Thursday, 18 June, 1998 08:44

Subject: DML: Who's DMC is it?

>    Hello!

>             I remember awhile back, maybe.. 2 years ago, I saw a DeLorean

>come into my Junior High School parking lot.. Someone came up to it, opened

>the door, literally threw their books in, and it *rumbled* off. SNIP
At the risk of playing devil's advocate, it seems important to remember that

these cars, like any cars, are possessions.  I took pretty good care of mine

[and regret selling it to this day] but it's not technically against the law

to abuse what really amounts to a mode of transportation.  Sure, it seems

inappropriate to us [I'm guessing that everyone on this list felt a certain

revulsion in seeing the DeLorean destroyed at the conclusion of BTTF3] but,

to some, it's all just normal wear-and-tear on a vehicle notorious for

developing its own problems, regardless of treatment.  I've seen people

trash things like Vectors, which are rather less replaceable than DeLoreans,

simply because they can afford to, and don't really feel guilty about the

mindless exorbiance of wrecking a $300,000 car.  As stupid and, possibly,

evil as it may seem to the observer, it's still the prerogative of the owner

to treat a possession his own way.
Sorry if this seems like an inappropriate reply to the mention of lobbing

books into a 'rumbling' DeLorean; but it sorta looks like it could become

the ever-recycled topic of losers who drive wih their doors open, etc.

Essentially, the point is 'take care of your own car, if you want it to look

and run like new'.  But, about looking over the fence to see what sort of

injustice your neighbour is up to...unless the preservation of DeLoreans can

be protected under spousal abuse laws or something, the best we can hope for

is a string of 'what a shame' responses over the habits of a minority of

DeLorean owners who can't tell a DeLorean from a Datsun.
- --Gremlin

webmaster(AT)gremlin.net

http://gremlin.net
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 13:40:20 +0000

From: ausmith(AT)pdx.oneworld.com

Subject: Re: DML: "Di-electric" grease
Hi,
Don't know about the product mentioned but the only grease I know of 

that is truly di-electric is sold through electrical supply houses. 

It's primary use is to stop electrolysis in incompatible metals like 

steel and aluminum. The brand I use is "Ilsco De-Ox". In building 

it's required where the main power cables enter the panel, Aluminum 

cable entering copper clamps. Electrolysis will result in pitting of 

both surfaces and an oxide forming that resists current flow and 

results in heat at the junction. Another effect is that incompatible 

metals, whether or not electricity is present, might as well be 

welded together ( Try removing the brass plug on the left intake rail 

on your engine ).
Chris
> For those of you who were at the tech session held by Rob Grady, he 

> mentioned using di-electric grease, or grease that does not conduct 

> electricity. Rob stated that dielectric grease should be used to 

> lubricate and protect electrical connections since the grease will 

> not ground out electrical circuits. Unfortunately, no one seemed real 

> clear on exactly what type of grease is actually "di-electric." Well, 

> when I returned home, I used my multitestor to check the White 

> Lithium grease that I have been using, and sure enough - it is 

> non-conductive. The brand I have is Gunk White Lithium grease, which 

> I purchased at Pep Boys. This stuff is also used on mechanical parts, 

> such as hinges, etc. I have been using it to lubricate all parts as I 

> go through the car and clean and relubricate all connections and 

> joints/hinges.

> If anyone who is more electrically or mechanically inclined has a 

> better idea, please share it with us.

> 

> Greg Guillot

> VIN #2926

> 

> 

> 

> 
------------------------------
End of dmcnews-digest V3 #378

*****************************
 Postings to the DELOREAN MAILING LIST are the opinions of the author and

 not necessarily those of the list moderator (James Espey) or his

Internet

 Service Provider(s). The list moderator makes every effort to screen out

 false, misleading, and negative postings, but it is up to you, the

reader

 of the DELOREAN MAILING LIST, to realize that nothing should be taken as

 actual fact without research and investigation of your own.







Go to previous digest | Go to next digest.

Back to DeLorean Mailing List Page.
Return to Back Issues page.

Search the back issues.
Having problems with these pages? Have a good idea for the back Issues? Email me at: backissues(AT)dmcnews.com

LinkExchange
Member of the LinkExchange